Draft of JCM Memorandum to 7th CPC –PREFACE
Draft of JCM Memorandum to 7th CPC – Please give your valuable suggestions
National Council (Staff Side) Joint Consultative Machinery Central Government Employees 13-C, Ferozshah Road, New Delhi – 110001 E Mail : [email protected] No.NC/JCM/2014
Shiva Gopal Mishra Secretary Dear Comrade, The draft of JCM Memorandum to 7th CPC is placed on National Council JCM website www.ncjcmstaffside.com you are requested to send your suggestions if any positively before 28th June 2014. We will be submitting our memorandum on 30th June.most urgent
With greeting
Sd/-
yours sincerly
(Shiva Gopal Mishra)
PREFACE
The 6th CPC submitted its report in March 2008. It made major changes in the structure of pay scales by introducing the concept of Grade Pay. Their recommendations were implemented with effect from 1.1.2006. There were plethora of anomalies, common as well as department specific. None of these anomalies were removed despite several rounds of discussions.
On 1.1.2011, the percentage of DA entitlement crossed over 50%. Since the erosion of the value of wages by that time had become enormous, the demand for merger of DA was raised by the employees. Some of them demanded setting up of the 7th CPC on the plea that the residency period of any wage structure must not exceed 5 years, especially in the background that the pay revision in most of the PSUs takes place at the interval of 5 years. They also pointed out that unlike the 5th CPC the 6th CPC had not suggested as to when the next wage revision must be attempted. The Government ignored those demands, despite well knowing that the inflation and abnormal price rise of food and other essential commodities had reduced the purchasing capacity of the government employees significantly. Government refused to discuss these demands either bilaterally or at the forum of JCM. A section of the employees went on a day‟s strike action, while the industrial workers took the strike ballot. Climate of confrontation emerged. Taking note of these developments, Government in September 2013 announced the setting up of the 7th CPC. The Standing Council of JCM, National Council met on to discuss various issues connected with the finalisation of the terms of reference. The following suggestions were made for incorporation in the Terms of Reference (TOR): a) The Commission should have a labour representative. b) DA (the extent of percentage as on 1.1.2014) to be merged and treated as pay for all purposes. c) To include GDS within the ambit of 7th CPC. d) To grant Interim Relief @ 25% of Pay + GP. e) To ensure that the 7th CPC recommendation will be effective from 1.1.2014. f) To ensure parity in pension for all pensioners as per the 5th CPC recommendation. In spite of holding out assurance, no further discussions were held. The Government unilaterally notified the Terms of Reference. The Staff Side has now submitted a memorandum to 7th Central Pay Commission on the twin issues, i.e. the need to grant interim relief and merger of Dearness Allowance. It will be the endeavour of the Staff Side to bring about community of approach on all issues concerning the wages, allowances and other relevant matters, as was the www.ncjcmstaffside.comcase in the previous occasions. We are hopeful that all the Associations/ Federations/Unions of Central Government employees will endorse this memorandum, prepared by the Staff Side, National Council, JCM on their behalf. No doubt they will submit separate memorandum on department specific issues. With this introduction, we submit this memorandum to the 7th CPC for their consideration.
Chapter II
Employment under Central Government
We have relied upon two Governmental sources to prepare the requisite data needed to analyse the trend of growth or decline in the number of personnel employed by the Government of India. The Pay Research Unit, functioning under the Department of Expenditure has published the brouchure carrying data up to the financial year 2011-12. The Director General, Employment and Training has published the Census of Central Government Employees which carries details for the year 2008-2009 (31.3.2009). The tables appended to this chapter are sourced from the above mentioned Brouchers.
Table 2-1 depicts the sanctioned and working strength group-wise , for a period covering 7 years from 2005-06 to 2011-12, whereas Table 2.2 indicates the position in 1995-96 and 2011-12. The sanctioned strength as in 1995-96 (for all groups together) which stood at 4215932 shrunk to 3684543 in 2011-12. The reduction effected through abolition of posts or whole scale conversion of Department in to PSUs was of the order of 531389 (12.6%), when it is viewed with reference to the working strength (men in position), the reduction was 808248 (20.7%). The difference between the sanctioned strength of 1995-96 and working strength of 2011-12 was as huge as 1131402. In other words, the government was functioning with almost 27% less man power, even though the man power requirement in the 16 years between 1995-96 to 2011-12 had enormously increased due to the expansion of Governmental activities both extensively and intensively. The canard that was spread through out the period that the government had accumulated a lot of fab in the post independent era, unfortunately gathered momentum, which led the government to set up the Expenditure Commission, in the wake of 5th CPC wage revision. Not being satisfied with the speed of abolition of posts, Government issued an executive fiat in 2001, whereby two-third of all vacant posts was directed to be abolished. The posts are normally created in government after a procrastinated inter-departmental study. The Cabinet has to give its assent for the proposal for creation of posts to materialise. In the process of implementation of the said executive fiat, which was in currency from 2001 to 2009 (nine years continuously), the posts created after such thorough deliberations and with the seal of approval from the highest political forum was simply ordered to be abolished arbitrarily. This created a void, which affected adversely the very functioning of some departments, www.ncjcmstaffside.com
making it necessary for the heads of organizations either to outsource the functions or contract it out or engage personnel on fixed time period contract basis, giving room for plethora of administrative problems. The efficacy, built assiduously over the years by the Departments was destroyed. The Citizen Charter prepared by these Departments, remained only as an ornamental piece on the walls of Government offices.
Incidentally, it may be noted from Table 2.2 that there had been no reduction or abolition in Group A posts but reduced the sanctioned strength of Group B (Gazetted) posts which, however, have no element of direct recruitment. The entire 1237682 Group D posts were either abolished or upgraded as Group C.
The illogical directive, conceived by the Department of Personnel as a means to speed up the process of pruning brought in its wake the undesirable practice of exploiting the job seekers. They were driven to the doors of unscrupulous contractors for pittance of wages. What we would like to bring to the notice of the Commission is that the existence of a large array of personnel employed by the Government through contractors and other methods in violation of the laws of the land, whose number is invisible in the statistical data, we have reproduced in this chapter. Though reprehensible, it is a fact that there had been a concerted effort on the part of the Government to push a major segment of the governmental functions into informal sector where employment need not be in consonance with the existing rules and regulations.
We fervently hope that the Commission will be able to collect the data of such informal employment by each department; data of the functions outsourced; and the expenditure incurred thereon to get a fair view of the number of persons actually employed by the Government of India in carrying out its day to day activities.
From the figures depicted in Table 2.3, it could be seen that Railways continue to be the biggest employer engaging the largest number of Government employees. As on 1.3.2012 Railways had on their rolls, 1305700 persons, of which 1288400 are Group C employees. Ministry of Home Affairs, under whom the para-military forces function, has taken the second position with 830276 persons employed as on 1.3.2012. They have pushed the Defence Ministry to third position. During the period between 1995-96 and 2011-12, unlike in many other organization, there had been no abolition of posts in para-military services. In fact there had been a constant increase in their number. In the year 1995-96, the Ministry of Home Affairs had 5.7 lakh employees. As on 1.3.2012 it rose to 9.3 lakhs.
Defence civilian employees number about 368594 with a percentage share of 11.95. Postal employees are 211107 (6.84%), Revenue 98787 (3.2%) and others 270066 (8.76%). These figures clearly indicate that large majority of Central Government employees (88%) are either industrial or operational staff. Hardly 10% constitute
the administrative, technical, professional and clerical staff. Vast majority of the employees is deployed in those organizations providing goods and services. The general impression that the wage bill of Central Government is for administrative purposes is , therefore, ill-covered.
Woman Employees
As per Table No.2.4, of the total number of regular employees as on 31.3.2009 (for which the figures are available) the number of woman employees were 311002, i.e., 10.04%. Railways have 28.66% with reference to total woman employees and just 6.43% with reference to railway workers. The respective figures for Communication Ministry is 11.10 and 15.78 for Defence civilians, 12.66 and 10.79 and in the case of others 47.58 and 13.11.
The largest number of employees as on 31.3.2009 was in the Grade Pay bracket of 2400 and 2800. 802194 persons (25.89%) were either with Grade Pay of Rs. 2400 or Rs.2800. Location-wise, largest concentration of Central Government employees was in Delhi, i.e., 203051 (6.55%) due to the fact that all Central Ministry headquarters are located at Delhi.
Table No. 2.7 reveals the declining trend of regular employment in Central Government. In 1990, as per the census of Central Government Employees prepared by DGET the number of regular employees was 37.74 which got reduced to 30.99 in 2009 (Figures are available upto 2009). The index (Base Year 1971 = 100) has come down from 141.27 (in 1991) to 114.82 (in 2009). The DGET has highlighted the following indicators that emerged from the census:
1). As per the result of Census Enquiries, the total regular employment under Central Government as on 31st March, 2009 was 30.99 lakh as against 31.12 lakh on 31st March, 2008. The employment has, thus, recorded a decline of 0.42% in 2009 over 2008.
(2).Employment in Ministry of Railways was the highest (44.74%) followed by the Ministry of Home Affairs (24.14%), Defence civilian (11.77%), Communications & IT (7.06%) and Finance (3.49%). Other Ministries/Departments collectively shared the rest of 9% of the total Central Government regular employment.
(3).Out of 30.99 lakh regular employees, 3.11 lakh were women. The proportion of women in the total employment is almost static, around 10% in the year 2009, 2008 and 2006.
(4).About 95% of regular Central Government employees were Non-Gazetted. The overall ratio of Gazetted to Non-Gazetted employees was 1:19. In the case of Ministry of Railways, however, this ratio was 1:114.
(5) Amongst regular Central Government employees, 63% were holding Group-„C‟ posts and 26% were in Group-„D‟ posts. About 8% were holding Group-„B‟ posts whereas employees holding Group –„A‟ posts were only about 3%.
(6).About 90% of regular Central Government employees were found in the Grade pay of Rs. Up to 1800 to Rs. 5400 which mainly consists of Group „B‟, Group „C‟ and Group „D‟ posts. Only 0.16% employees were in the highest scale i.e. HAG + Apex & Cabinet Secretary level.
(7).Amongst regular Central Government employees, 18% were working at offices located in „X‟ class cities and 29% in „Y‟ class cities. The percentage of employees in all the cities/areas other than class X and Y cities was 53%.
(8).Amongst States and Union Territory Administrations, the highest number of regular Central Government employees was in the State of Uttar Pradesh (9.51%) followed by Maharashtra (9.06%), West Bengal (8.54%), Delhi (6.55%), Andhra Pradesh (5.97%), Tamil Nadu (4.79%) and Madhya Pradesh (4.07%). In remaining States/U.Ts the proportion was less than 4%.
In the chapter dealing with the state of economy of the country, we have given a Table 3.4 indicating the declining trend in the percentage share of wages and allowances with reference to both revenue receipts and expenditure. The 3rd CPC has gone on record to state that a fall in the percentage share of wages and allowances against the revenue receipts/expenditure will provide the requisite leeway for the Government without placing any undue strain on the exchequer. One of the oft-repeated contention is that increase in the wages of government employees would generate demand-pull inflation, which ultimately reduce their purchasing power to the levels before the said revision. This is not only fallacious but mischievous too. As observed by the National Commission on Labour (in the context of grant of Dearness Allowance) the inflationary pressure due to wage increase is extremely insignificant. With every organized sector of the economy securing benefits through collective bargaining it is unethical to single out the government employees and that too on an untested hypothesis of demand pull inflation. In fact as mentioned elsewhere in this memorandum, the central government employees had been bearing the brunt of the consequences of inflation. When the avowed objective of public policy is to expand employment opportunities and raise the level of productivity, protection of existing real wages and normal rates of growth of such wages cannot be portrayed by any stretch of imagination as anti-development.
Table 2.1
Gr.A
Year
|
Number of sanctioned posts
|
Number of incumbents in position
|
Number of vacant posts
|
Percentage of vacant posts to total sanctioned posts in the group
|
2005-06
|
91414
|
79005
|
12409
|
13.57
|
2006-07
|
91750
|
78987
|
12763
|
13.91
|
2007-08
|
93360
|
79469
|
13891
|
14.88
|
2008-09
|
93616
|
80663
|
12953
|
13.84
|
2009-10
|
96504
|
82926
|
13578
|
14.07
|
2010-11
|
98977
|
82272
|
14503
|
14.65
|
2011-12
|
100869
|
87960
|
12909
|
12.80
|
B(G)
Year
|
Number of sanctioned posts
|
Number of incumbents in position
|
Number of vacant posts
|
Percentage of vacant posts to total sanctioned posts in the group
|
2005-06
|
87038
|
80150
|
6888
|
7.91
|
2006-07
|
83147
|
76093
|
7054
|
8.48
|
2007-08
|
81701
|
74177
|
7524
|
9.21
|
2008-09
|
88890
|
79446
|
9444
|
10.62
|
2009-10
|
91307
|
80405
|
10902
|
11.94
|
2010-11
|
86657
|
76479
|
10178
|
11.75
|
2011-12
|
86840
|
76724
|
10116
|
11.65
|
B(NG)
Year
|
Number of sanctioned posts
|
Number of incumbents in position
|
Number of vacant posts
|
Percentage of vacant posts to total sanctioned posts in the group
|
2005-06
|
71960
|
60086
|
11874
|
16.50
|
2006-07
|
73253
|
62500
|
10753
|
14.68
|
2007-08
|
73906
|
60833
|
13073
|
17.69
|
2008-09
|
102075
|
78626
|
23449
|
22.97
|
2009-10
|
115086
|
95483
|
19603
|
17.03
|
2010-11
|
142098
|
116249
|
25849
|
18.19
|
2011-12
|
144454
|
113477
|
30977
|
21.44
|
C(NG)
Year
|
Number of sanctioned posts
|
Number of incumbents in position
|
Number of vacant posts
|
Percentage of vacant posts to total sanctioned posts in the group
|
2005-06
|
2343081
|
2071299
|
271782
|
11.60
|
2006-07
|
2343359
|
2075497
|
267862
|
11.43
|
2007-08
|
2346621
|
2091793
|
254828
|
10.86
|
2008-09
|
2337494
|
2094655
|
242839
|
10.39
|
2009-10
|
3299398
|
2809545
|
489853
|
14.85
|
2010-11
|
3335797
|
2804736
|
531061
|
15.92
|
2011-12
|
3352380
|
2806369
|
546011
|
16.29
|
Gr.D
Year
|
Number of sanctioned posts
|
Number of incumbents in position
|
Number of vacant posts
|
Percentage of vacant posts to total sanctioned posts in the group
|
2005-06
|
932985
|
818445
|
114540
|
12.28
|
2006-07
|
955024
|
816193
|
138831
|
14.54
|
2007-08
|
966600
|
810560
|
156040
|
16.14
|
2008-09
|
942208
|
773953
|
168255
|
17.86
|
Unclassified
Year
|
Number of sanctioned posts
|
Number of incumbents in position
|
Number of vacant posts
|
Percentage of vacant posts to total sanctioned posts in the group
|
2005-06
|
291
|
289
|
2
|
0.69
|
2006-07
|
4
|
4
|
0
|
0
|
Table 2.2.
Table 2.2.
Statement showing sanctioned and working strength Group-wise in 1995-96 and 2011-12 of civilian employees of the Government of India. (including para- military force personnel)
Group A
Year
|
Sanctioned Strength
|
Working Strength
|
Vacant Posts
|
% of Vacant Posts
|
1995-96
|
89262
|
76891
|
12371
|
13.86
|
2011-12
|
100869
|
87960
|
12909
|
12.80
|
Group B(G)
Year
|
Sanctioned Strength
|
Working Strength
|
Vacant Posts
|
% of Vacant Posts
|
1995-96
|
95652
|
86694
|
8958
|
9.77
|
2011-12
|
86840
|
76724
|
10116
|
11.65
|
Group B(NG)
Year
|
Sanctioned Strength
|
Working Strength
|
Vacant Posts
|
% of Vacant Posts
|
1995-96
|
93166
|
87203
|
7963
|
8.55
|
2011-12
|
144454
|
113477
|
30977
|
21.44
|
Group C
Year
|
Sanctioned Strength
|
Working Strength
|
Vacant Posts
|
% of Vacant Posts
|
1995-96
|
2674836
|
2476146
|
198690
|
7.42
|
2011-12
|
3352380
|
2806369
|
546011
|
16.29
|
Group D
Year
|
Sanctioned Strength
|
Working Strength
|
Vacant Posts
|
% of Vacant Posts
|
1995-96
|
1237682
|
1142788
|
94894
|
7.66
|
2011-12
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
Unclassified
Year
|
Sanctioned Strength
|
Working Strength
|
Vacant Posts
|
% of Vacant Posts
|
1995-96
|
25334
|
23056
|
2278
|
9.38
|
2011-12
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
Total
Year
|
Sanctioned Strength
|
Working Strength
|
Vacant Posts
|
% of Vacant Posts
|
1995-96
|
4215932
|
3892778
|
325154
|
7.71
|
2011-12
|
3684543
|
3084530*
|
600013
|
16.28
|
Reduction
|
531389
|
808248
|
(-)274859
|
|
12.6% w.r.to s/s/95-96
|
20.7%w.r.to w/w of 95-96
|
*The difference between the sanctioned strength of 1995-96 and the men in position in 2011-12 is 1131402, which works out to 26.83% with reference to the S/S of 1995-96 Source: Brochure on Pay and allowance of Central Government Civilian Employees 2011-12 and 1995-96.
Note: During the period between 1995-96 and 2011-12 (16 years) the total number of posts abolished in all categories works out to 531389 which is 12.6% of the SS of 1995-96 and the vacancy position rose from 325154 to 600013 i.e. from 7.71% to 16.28%. The brunt of the reduction had been borne by Group B Non-gazetted and Group D.
Table 2.3
GROUP WISE & STATUS-WISE NUMBER OF CENTRAL GOVT. CIVILIAN REGULAR
EMPLOYEES AS ON 1.3.2012. IN MAJOR MINISTRIES/ DEPARTMENTS
A*
|
B(G)
|
B(NG)
|
C
|
Total
|
||
1
|
Railways
|
|||||
S/S
|
8748
|
7652
|
0
|
1560388
|
1576788
|
|
Percentage
|
8.67
|
8.81
|
0
|
46.55
|
42.8
|
|
W/S
|
9228
|
8072
|
0
|
1288400
|
1305700
|
|
Percentage
|
10.49
|
10.52
|
0
|
45.91
|
42.33
|
|
2
|
Home Affairs
|
|||||
S/S
|
18953
|
2390
|
42776
|
864815
|
928934
|
|
Percentage
|
18.79
|
2.75
|
29.61
|
25.8
|
25.21
|
|
W/S
|
14817
|
1763
|
32921
|
780775
|
830276
|
|
Percentage
|
16.85
|
2.3
|
29.01
|
27.82
|
26.92
|
|
3
|
Diffence(Civilian)
|
|||||
S/S
|
13773
|
12213
|
14518
|
443233
|
483737
|
|
Percentage
|
13.65
|
14.07
|
10.05
|
13.22
|
13.13
|
|
W/S
|
13185
|
11847
|
11174
|
332328
|
368594
|
|
Percentage
|
14.99
|
15.44
|
9.85
|
11.84
|
11.95
|
|
4
|
Posts
|
|||||
S/S
|
610
|
1155
|
5639
|
203703
|
2111.7
|
|
Percentage
|
0.61
|
1.33
|
3.9
|
6.08
|
5.73
|
|
W/S
|
610
|
1155
|
5639
|
203703
|
211107
|
|
Percentage
|
0.69
|
1.51
|
4.97
|
7.26
|
6.84
|
|
5
|
Revenue
|
|||||
S/S
|
8255
|
24144
|
31355
|
74569
|
138323
|
|
Percentage
|
8.18
|
27.8
|
21.71
|
2.22
|
3.75
|
|
W/S
|
5881
|
20885
|
23353
|
48668
|
98787
|
|
Percentage
|
6.69
|
27.22
|
20.58
|
9.74
|
3.2
|
|
6
|
Others
|
|||||
S/S
|
50530
|
39286
|
50166
|
205672
|
345654
|
|
Percentage
|
50.1
|
45.24
|
34.73
|
6.13
|
9.38
|
|
W/S
|
44239
|
33002
|
40390
|
152435
|
270066
|
|
Percentage
|
50.29
|
43.01
|
35.59
|
5.43
|
8.76
|
|
S/S total
|
100869
|
86840
|
144454
|
3352380
|
3684543
|
|
W/S Total
|
87960
|
76724
|
113477
|
2806369
|
3084530
|
* includes some non guzetted posts also.
Source. Page No. 25 of Brochure on Pay and Allowances of Central Govt. Civilian employees 2011-12 (Brochure-34) by Pay Research Unit Department of Expenditure Minisry of Finance New Delhi
S.No.
|
Ministry
|
Women employment as on 31st March, 2009
|
||
Number
|
percentage share to the Total regular employees in the respective organization.
|
Percentage share to the total women employees in Central Government.
|
||
1
|
2
|
3
|
4
|
5
|
1.
|
Communication & IT
|
34525(of218788)
|
15.78
|
11.10
|
2.
|
Railways
|
89128(1386123)
|
6.43
|
28.66
|
3.
|
Defence (Civilian)
|
39353(364718)
|
10.79
|
12.66
|
4.
|
Others
|
147996(1128878)
|
13.11
|
47.58
|
Total
|
311002(3098507)
|
10.04
|
100
|
Source: Table: 3 . Page 5. Census of Central Government Employees: DGET
Table 2.5
Estimated distribution of regular central government employees
according to various grade pay:
As on 31st March 2009
|
||
Grade Pay in Rs.
|
No. Of employees
|
Percentage to total
|
Upto Rs. 1800
|
792677
|
25.58
|
Rs. 1900 and Rs. 2000
|
544426
|
17.57
|
Rs. 2400 and Rs. 2800
|
802194
|
25.89
|
Rs. 4200, 4600 Rs. 4800
|
731877
|
23.62
|
Rs. 5400
|
84266
|
2.72
|
Rs. 6600 and Rs. 7600
|
71500
|
2.31
|
Rs. 8700 and Rs. 8900
|
39286
|
1.27
|
Rs. 10,000 Rs.12000
|
27323
|
0.88
|
HAG + Apex and Cabinet Secretary
|
4958
|
0.16
|
Total
|
3098507
|
100.00
|
Table 2.6
Location wise Dispersal of employees in different class of cities
Employment in 2009
|
||
Class/ City
|
Number
|
% to total
|
“X” class Cities
|
||
Bangalore(UA)
|
31565
|
1.02
|
Chennai(UA)
|
68392
|
2.21
|
Delhi(UA)
|
203051
|
6.55
|
Greater Mumbai(UA)
|
101389
|
3.27
|
Hyderabad(UA)
|
60461
|
2.92
|
“Y”Class Cities
|
895570
|
28.90
|
All the Cities / Area other than Class X and Class Y Cities
|
1647646
|
53.18
|
Total
|
3098507
|
100.00
|
Table 2.7
Trend in Central Government regular employment during 1990-2009
Central Govt. employment(regular)
|
|||
As on 31st March
|
Number (in lakh)
|
% increase/ decrease over previous available year
|
Index of employment(Base 100 in 1971)
|
1990
|
37.74
|
0.69
|
139.8
|
1991
|
83.13
|
1.03
|
141.27
|
1992-94
|
–
|
–
|
–
|
1995
|
39.82
|
4.43
|
147.54
|
1996-2000
|
–
|
–
|
–
|
2001
|
38.76
|
(-)2.66
|
143.61
|
2002-2003
|
–
|
–
|
–
|
2004
|
31.64
|
(-)18.37
|
117.23
|
2005
|
–
|
–
|
–
|
2006
|
31.16
|
(-) 1.53
|
115.45
|
2007
|
–
|
–
|
–
|
2008
|
31.12
|
(-) 0.13
|
115.30
|
2009
|
30.99
|
(-) 0.42
|
114.82
|
Table 2.8
Statement showing Sanctioned Posts and Men in position department-wise
Year
|
Railway
|
Defence
|
P&T
|
Other Deptts.
|
Home Affairs
|
Total Sanctioned strength
|
Total Men in Position
|
1
|
2
|
3
|
4
|
5
|
6
|
7
|
8
|
1995-96
|
17.1
15.9
|
5.9
5.1
|
7.5
7.2
|
6.0
5.4
|
5.7
5.4
|
4217932
|
3892778
|
1996-97
|
17.0
15.0
|
5.9
5.1
|
7.5
7.3
|
6.1
5.5
|
5.9
5.4
|
4218194
|
3894948
|
1997-98
|
15.6
14.5
|
5.8
5.0
|
8.6
7.9
|
6.0
5.3
|
5.9
5.7
|
4192735
|
3847049
|
1998-99
|
15.1
14.0
|
5.8
5.0
|
7.7
7.1
|
6.0
5.3
|
6.0
5.7
|
4967049
|
3729274
|
1999-00
|
16.8
15.8
|
5.8
5.0
|
7.7
7.1
|
5.3
4.7
|
6.1
5.8
|
4172031
|
3855316
|
2000-01
|
15.6
15.5
|
5.8
5.0
|
3.0
2.8
|
5.2
4.7
|
6.4
6.1
|
3606482
|
3426018
|
2001-02
|
16.3
15.1
|
4.7
3.5
|
2.9
2.7
|
5.1
4.5
|
7.3
6.9
|
3633006
|
3289849
|
2002-03
|
16.3
14.8
|
4.7
3.5
|
2.9
2.7
|
5.1
4.5
|
7.3
6.9
|
3620183
|
3236503
|
2003-04
|
16.2
14.5
|
4.7
3.5
|
2.3
1.9
|
5.2
4.5
|
7.2
6.9
|
3560433
|
3128134
|
2004-05
|
16.0
14.3
|
4.7
3.5
|
2.3
1.9
|
5.1
4.4
|
7.5
6.8
|
3559831
|
3088009
|
2005-06
|
15.8
14.1
|
4.7
3.6
|
2.3
2.3
|
4.8
4.1
|
7.5
6.9
|
3526769
|
3109274
|
2006-07
|
15.7
14.1
|
4.8
3.6
|
2.2
2.2
|
4.9
4.2
|
7.7
7.0
|
3546537
|
3109274
|
2007-08
|
15.7
13.9
|
4.8
3.6
|
2.2
2.1
|
4.9
4.0
|
8.0
7.4
|
3562188
|
3116832
|
2008-09
|
15.8
13.8
|
4.8
3.6
|
2.2
2.2
|
4.8
3.9
|
8.1
7.5
|
3564283
|
3107343
|
2009-10
|
15.8
13.6
|
4.8
3.6
|
2.1
2.1
|
4.8
3.8
|
8.6
7.6
|
3602295
|
3068359
|
2010-11
|
15.8
13.3
|
4.9
3.8
|
2.1
2.1
|
4.8
3.7
|
9.1
8.0
|
3663529
|
3081938
|
2011-12
|
15.8
13.1
|
4.8
3.7
|
2.1
2.1
|
4.8
3.7
|
9.3
8.3
|
3684543
|
3084530
|
Figures in columns 2 to 6 are in lakhs rounded to one decimal point and actual figures given in Column 7 & 8 representing total figures. – Figures given in second line represent men in position in each year.
SOURCE-http://ncjcmstaffside.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/06/Memorandum-to-be-submitted-by-NCJCM-Staff-Side-24.06.2014.pdf
Leave a Reply
You must be logged in to post a comment.